In full disclosure I didn’t watch the whole thing because I was getting annoyed, but if anyone is interested in doing some debunking: https://youtu.be/maX5lKahWNQ
I’m not informed enough to respond to this, but I’m assuming that 2GIG has thought of things as simple as jamming 345MHz.
Well, yes, this is not a new concern. Jamming/spoofing a sensor radio signal and bombarding the transceiver with closed signals is a way of manipulating a wireless RF system. This also isn’t unique to 2GIG in any way. Neither is publishing the frequency, which is available on literally any product data sheet from any manufacturer. 
I’m assuming that 2GIG has thought of things as simple as jamming 345MHz.
You assume correctly. The 2GIG Panel itself can register RF jamming as a trouble alert. See Q65 in programming.
The current best way to leap this particular hurdle is to use encrypted sensor transmission. The new Qolsys S-Line sensors utilize RF encryption. I would expect to see more wireless hardware using encryption and/or spread spectrum RF for all manufacturers in the future. I anticipate it moving that direction.
Thanks Jason. Not that I am at all concerned about this for myself, but out of curiosity what does the system do if it is armed and registers an RF jam?
I am checking with 2GIG on that since the manual declines to address it. I am of the understanding that the panel should treat the event as an alarm signal similar to how a tamper is treated while armed, however I want to verify that with engineers.